Why Non-Traded REITs Aren’t as Liquid as You Think

Earlier this month, thousands of investors in a $22 billion real estate fund went to pull their money out.

They’d been told they could redeem every quarter. But this time, instead of getting their cash, they got an unwelcome surprise: redemptions suspended.

Starwood, the firm that runs the fund, didn't do anything wrong. No mismanagement, no scam, no fraud. Given what the fund was holding, suspending redemptions was probably the responsible move.

Nothing malfunctioned. The fund did exactly what this kind of fund can always be forced to do.

The trouble started long before the redemption gate came down, in what these investors believed they owned. They thought they could pull their money out whenever they wanted.

What they had was an illusion of liquidity.

And it fools even sophisticated investors for one reason: everything about how these funds are sold tells you they’re as good as cash.

 

Sold Like a Stock

Non-traded REITs, the biggest examples being Blackstone's BREIT and Starwood's SREIT, are sold through financial advisors and show up on your account statement right next to your stocks, ETFs, and index funds.

Their value is driven by the fund’s net asset value (NAV), not a stock price – so it sits there, smooth and stable, barely moving from month to month. And they let you request redemptions monthly or quarterly.

So they read as something close to cash: money you can reach when you want it, without the stomach-drop of watching stocks swing around (especially if your advisor talked up the redemption feature). For a lot of people, that steadiness feels safer than the market itself…and generally, it is.

That impression is what gets someone to put $100,000 into one of these, absolutely sure they can pull it back out if life changes. However they arrived at it, the belief is the same: this investment is liquid.

 

A Fund Is Only as Liquid as What It Owns

To fulfill any redemption requests, the fund needs cash. Most keep some on hand (reserve funds, maybe a line of credit, etc.) to cover operating expenses and meet the typical volume of redemptions.

When only a few investors want out, that buffer covers them, and everything feels liquid.

But when everyone wants out at once, the buffer drains. And the fund quickly runs into the truth of what it actually holds.

A real estate fund owns real estate – so the only way to cover a larger-than-expected number of redemption requests is to sell its properties. That takes time, and nobody wants to be a forced seller in a soft market, so the fund closes the redemption gate.

The cash was never sitting there waiting for you – it was tied up in real estate the whole time. The ability to “redeem whenever you wanted” was a thin layer of liquidity painted over an illiquid asset…a layer that only runs as deep as the fund’s cash on hand.

 

The Liquidity You’re Shown vs. What You Get

This is fundamentally different than stocks. When you want out of Apple, you sell, and the cash is in your bank a couple of days later. You might hate the price – but you get a price, today, because a share trades all day long.

A fund full of real estate inherits real estate’s illiquidity, no matter what your advisor says about quarterly redemptions. So the liquidity implied on your account statement and the liquidity the fund can actually deliver are not the same thing. They look identical right up until you try to get out – the only moment the difference matters.

Starwood wasn’t a one-off. Blackstone’s flagship real estate fund (BREIT) spent more than a year returning only a fraction of what investors asked for each quarter. Blue Owl did the same in business private credit, scrapping quarterly redemptions and telling investors their money would come back over years.

Even among the biggest names in the category, the lesson was the same: the exit was never as wide as it looked.

 

Match What You Believe to What You Own

None of this means non-traded funds are bad, or that you should avoid them. Plenty are legitimate and well-run. The point is simpler: what you believe about your money has to match what you actually own.

A fund that tells you plainly, “your capital is locked for two years, and after that you can request quarterly redemptions that are met if the cash is available,” has told you the truth. There’s no pretending it’s as good as cash, and you can plan your liquidity needs around that.

Illiquidity gets a bad name it doesn’t fully deserve. What burns people is the reverse: walking into an investment expecting liquidity that was never really on offer.

So when you size up one of these funds, judge its liquidity by what it holds, not by the redemption schedule in the brochure. Ask what it would have to sell to pay you in a bad month, and how long that would take.

That’s your real liquidity.

Found this valuable? Join hundreds of sophisticated investors and receive these insights direct to your inbox every week.